Wednesday, January 25, 2012
"Jane Eyre" (2011)
I have mixed feelings about this version of JANE EYRE, one of three that I have seen. I'm not one to reread his favorite books before watching the films, and so I didn't for this one. It has been years since I read this Charlotte Brontë's classic, and I was excited to sit down and let this heartbreaking love story unfold before me again.
A lot of the novel is missing here. Many story lines and important characters are omitted. Are they necessary?--that's what I'm trying to answer. I feel like my brain was doing a lot of filling in the gaps, drawing from what I remembered from reading the book. I wonder, would I have felt like the story was too thin or somewhat incomplete had I not read the book? The actors are so well cast. Jane is supposed to be plain, and Mia Wasikoska is plain here, but she makes plain interesting. Both her innocence and her idealism are believable. And who can resist Michael Fassbender? Rochester isn't supposed to be attractive. Fassbender is, but can act otherwise. Both actors look unconventional, but in the context of JANE EYRE they are captivating and compelling. It is beautifully filmed, too. I don't think it is as bold as it wants to be, but it is far from the much more mainstream version in 1996, as if its main goal is to resist being anything mainstream audiences would want it to be.
I had a great time. It captured my attention all the way through. I found it fulfilling. Is it a great film? I still can't make up my mind about that.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
"The Shop Around the Corner" (1940)
It's not uncommon that people go to see romantic comedies to oohs and ahhs, to laugh and maybe cry a little when the guy finally gets the gal. But that doesn't mean there's no room for intelligence in these films. My theory isn't that the studios aren't capable of writing romcoms the way they used to, but because they don't see the need to. No matter how bad these movies are, there are still far too many people who will flock to the theater to see them. Why make the effort when it's not necessary? Well, I for one wish I lived in those days where, regardless of the genres, movies are supposed to be smart and teach you something.
After that long rant, let me tell you that THE SHOP AROUND THE CORNER is one of those movies that will make you oohs and ahhs in all the right places, yet still deliver great writing and stunning performances. It stars James Stewart as a shop clerk who falls in love with a girl he hasn't met but only communicated via letters. It's no surprise that the girl turns out to be one of his co-workers, played by Margaret Sulavan, with whom he doesn't get along. Aside from these two, the film introduces us to many fanciful characters with story lines of their own. The shop itself is a character, which takes us to the fictional Budapest that is just as alive as the people in it. We know the lovers would get together in the end, but Stewart's comic talents just make the journey so much fun to watch. By the end you will have had a good time and your brain still intact.
Friday, January 6, 2012
"The Long, Hot Summer" (1958)
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
"Adaptation" (2002)
What a trip this movie is. And what a great performance by Nicholas Cage. He plays two characters, one a struggling screenwriter and another his twin brother, a good-for-nothing who is apparently an up-and-coming screenwriter. At the start of the movie, both brothers are losers, but Cage beautifully shows us that there can be more than one way to portray a loser while making them both heartfelt and sympathetic. Not once did I get confused about who is who, even though both characters look very much the same. Meryl Streep also gives a moving and brave performance--what else could you have expected from her?--as a successful but unhappy writer who falls in love with an eccentric orchid thief, played by Chris Cooper. But the merits of this film go beyond great acting. The script by Charlie (and Donald) Kaufman is both surprising and captivating from beginning to end. This film has been on my Netflix queue for years. I remember it being suggested to me after I gave BEING JOHN MALKOVICH 5 stars. Well, I’m also giving Spike Jonze’s ADAPTATION five stars, because isn’t just a great movie but also very inspiring.
Monday, January 2, 2012
"The Lady Eve" (1941)
Henry Fonda is handsome and adorable as Charles, a clumsy and gullible ophiologist who fall in love with Jean, a conniving gold-digger played by Barbara Stanwyck. A series of deceits follow as the two learn more about each other. THE LADY EVE is a charming comedy directed by Preston Sturges. I always have a hard time with stories where people fall in love too quickly, even in something like Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet." But this film goes on to show a some what realistic consequences of what happens when you lose your head and give your heart away too soon. After the whirlwind affair ends, you may not even recognize the person when you meet again. The writing is thoroughly entertaining and full of great comedic scenes.The use of disguise as a plot device reminisces Shakespeare quite a bit. What I like the most about the film is Fonda's performance. He trips and falls and bumps into things constantly, and does it all so naturally. Stanwyck does what she's supposed to do, though I find her performance average and lacking charms. If you're looking for a classic comedy, this is a good choice.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Why I'm returning to Buddhism
(It's late and I don't have time to edit, so I apologize for whatever grammatical errors that might lie ahead.)
I grew up a Buddhist by default. I was born in Thailand where a majority of people were Buddhists, as were my parents and both of their families. Buddhism was also a subject taught in school, which meant that every child growing up in Thailand, regardless of his or her religion, had to study the teachings of the Buddha. In school we were also taught to meditate, which we did at school as a part of our ritual before class started.
I grew up a Buddhist by default. I was born in Thailand where a majority of people were Buddhists, as were my parents and both of their families. Buddhism was also a subject taught in school, which meant that every child growing up in Thailand, regardless of his or her religion, had to study the teachings of the Buddha. In school we were also taught to meditate, which we did at school as a part of our ritual before class started.
I was, for a time, very interested in my religion. Having always had a spiritual tendency, I found the study of the teaching and the practice of meditation beneficial. They had helped me to deal with anger, confusion, anxiety, and whatever else I was experiencing at my age. Despite the fact that most people identified as Buddhists, however, not a lot of them actually studied or practiced the teachings outside of school, including my parents. Those who did were seen as odd and sometimes even ridiculed. I don’t recall having a hard time dealing with my religious identity. After all I was always an odd child for many reasons, and I wanted so much to be unique that I didn’t give a damn what anybody thought of me. It was the period in my life where I was most sure of myself.
As I got older, however, many circumstances caused me to veer away from Buddhism. A big part of it had to do with my immigrating to the United States. The way the monks here behaved, from what I heard, were different from what I was taught back home. I decided that I didn’t respect them, and because of that I had nowhere to go to keep my faith reaffirmed. I was also very drawn to the western culture by which I was all of a sudden surrounded. I thought, wrongly so, that most Americans were Christians, and that most Christians were Roman Catholic. I didn’t realize then that I was living in a liberal city, where I would be more discriminated against in school for being religious than for being Asian, gay, and an immigrant. My friends embraced all that I was except for my religion. They neither understood my need for spirituality and a sense of community, nor did they respect me and my choice.
Looking back I knew exactly why I wanted to be a Catholic. There was a church close by where I lived, and from the outside it was a beautiful building. I imagined that the inside of it probably looked as romantic as those churches I saw in films. When I finally went to St. Philip Neri for the first time, I immediately fell in love. It wasn’t as extravagant as in the movies, but it was very nice, as were the people there. But it took me a long time before I made that step. By then I had long given up on Buddhism. I had bought a copy of the Bible and started reading it. I also went to many Christian chatrooms and learned a lot from the discussion I was having with those Christians. At my first mass, everything was foreign and intriguing to me, and I must have loved it because I kept going back.
As a Christian I enjoyed having a god to talk and pray to. Buddhists didn’t have a deity, so that concept was new to me, and it took me a long time to convince myself that there really was a god and that he was listening. I succeeded. A few years later I was baptized. But by then I was no longer a regular church goer. I missed many masses, which meant that I also missed a lot of the classes I was supposed to go to before mass to prepare for my conversion. They let me “graduate,” but I wasn’t ready. Soon after that I stopped going to church. And a little while longer I would realize that if there really was a god he or she probably wouldn’t have time to listen to my prayers. And if he heard me he probably wouldn’t answer them. Why should he, when there is so much suffering in the world, when there are other needs much greater than mine that he neglected. I realized how significant prayers were to my faith, and without them there was nothing left for me in Christianity. I moved on.
During the past couple of years I was confronted with a lot of life’s daily obstacles. I realized that it was me who caused most of my sufferings. I didn’t like myself. I was too angry, too impatient, too insecure, too critical, too prejudiced, etc. I started turning to psychology to help me understand and deal with myself as well as others. While I enjoy my newfound passion, I felt that it wasn’t giving me the answer to my immediate needs, and I really in desperate needs for some answers. This year, especially, had been a lot more difficult than any period of time in my life, even during those adolescent years when I was adjusting to a whole new country and going through puberty and all that it entailed. Without going into details, I need peace more than ever. I started meditating regularly, which helped a lot, but not enough. It wasn’t until about a month ago that I checked out The Zencast, which is a podcast that compiles lectures from Buddhist teachers about the teachings of the Buddha. This was the answer I was looking for all along. It spoke directly to my needs. All this time I was running away from it, avoiding it, because I thought, “Well, I’ve been there, and I don’t want to do that again.” The idea of belonging to an organized religion yet again doesn’t appeal to me, but as I have always said about Buddhism, whenever someone asked me about my past with it, “I don’t see Buddhism so much as a religion, but as a set of practices that anybody could study and do. And when you do, there are both immediate and long-term results. It is scientific, because you can prove it, and practical.” Today I would also add that it is an early branch of psychology and philosophy that is both easy to understand and apply to your daily life. And since there is no deity, there is nobody to pledge your allegiance to. There is also no conversion, so anyone can just study and practice it without having to call herself a Buddhist.
Aside from the Zencast, I’ve been reading The Dhammapada, which is the scripture that is comprised of anecdotes and teachings of the Buddha. It is an easy and engaging read, and a wealth of wisdom in a small package. I am not a guru. I can neither teach you about Buddhism nor am I trying to convert anybody. I am only eager to share my experience with those who are interested. What prompted me to write this blog entry is to let you know that I have had a difficult year, and my study and practice have made it more bearable and me more content. If you have a stressful life or are unhappy for whatever reasons, and no matter what you’ve tried nothing seems to work, consider this an option. I can’t imagine it not working for anybody else.
Friday, December 30, 2011
I wanted to read 20 books this year, aside from short stories, plays, and shorter works like essays and poetry. I ended up with 17. I don't feel too badly about it, since most of these books are between 300-500 pages long, and two are over 1,000. I say my goal was more or less accomplished. Looking back I know that I slacked off once in a while and could have read more. There were also a few books that I started but didn't finish, which was a new thing since I usually don't give up on books no matter how boring they are. Anyway, here's the list of all the whole books I've read this year, which concists mainly of novels, but also some creative non-fiction and an autobiography.
"The Subtle Knife" by Phillip Pullman
"Wicked" by Gregory Maguire
"The House of Mirth" by Edith Wharton
"The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe
"Midlesex" by Jeffrey Eugenides
"This Side of Paradise" by F. Scott Fitzgerald
"Tess of the d'Uberville" by Thomas Hardy
"The Shipping News" by Annie Proulx
"The Things They carried" by Tim O'Bried
"My Life So Far" by Jane Fonda
"The Sun Also Rises" by Ernest Hemingway
"The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao" by Junot Díaz
"Anna Karenina" by Leo Tolstoy
"Jitterbug Perfume" by Tom Robbins
"Middlemarch by George Eliot
"Lives of the Circus Animals" by Christopher Bram
"Narcissus and Goldmund" by Herman Hesse
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




